It is obvious, in conclusion, that the “integrated duplication” option favoured by the Grand Chamber majority is the least onerous for the States. But the path of least resistance is not usually the best one for fundamental rights.
Dissenting opinion of judge Pavli, in Jesus Pinhal v. Portugal [GC], nos. 48047/15 and 2276/20, 9 July 2026
No comments:
Post a Comment