Showing posts with label homosexuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homosexuality. Show all posts

Saturday, September 6, 2014

Dictum of the day, or: "Go figure".

Heterosexuals get drunk and pregnant, producing unwanted children; their reward is to be allowed to marry. Homosexual couples do not produce unwanted children; their reward is to be denied the right to marry. Go figure.

 U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Baskin v. Bogan, (7th Cir., Sept. 4, 2014), J. Posner, p. 19-20.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Dictum of the day, or on the days past

Once upon a time it might have been difficult to apply those words to a same sex relationship because both in law and in reality the roles of the husband and wife were so different and those differences were defined by their genders. That is no longer the case. The law now differentiates between husband and wife in only a very few and unimportant respects. Husbands and wives decide for themselves who will go out to work and who will do the homework and child care. Mostly each does some of each. The roles are inter-changeable. There is thus no difficulty in applying the term 'marriage-like' to same sex relationships.

Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 (21 June 2004), Hale J., para. 144. 

Friday, October 8, 2010

Dictum of the day, or on the invisible man

The Court would first note that the respondent says that he is singled out for persecution because he is gay in his home country. The Court studied the demeanor of this individual very carefully throughout his testimony in Court today, and this gentleman does not appear to be overtly gay. The Court does not know whether he is or not, his testimony is that he is overtly gay and has been since he was 17 years old. Be that as it may, it is not readily apparent to a person who would see this gentleman for the first time that, that is the case, since he bears no effeminate traits or any other trait that would mark him as a homosexual.

Mladen Zeljko Todorovic v. U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Court of Appeals for Eleventh Circuit, no. 09-11625, 27 September 2010, p. 7 (citing oral decision of the Immigration Judge)